
Brann
NorwayFounded 1908

Season Report & Analysis
Brann - League 2025/2026
Comprehensive statistical analysis of Brann's season performance, including team metrics, player statistics, form analysis, home/away performance, and detailed insights.
Brann is currently competing in the League 2025/2026 season, sitting in 22th position with 8 points from 6 matches. The team represents Norway in this competition.
The team's record of 2 wins from 6 matches represents a 33.3% win rate, showing mixed results throughout the campaign. With 6 goals scored and 7 goals conceded, the team achieved a -1 goal difference, indicating areas for improvement in both attack and defense. The team averaged 1.00 goals per game, demonstrating modest attacking output.
This comprehensive report provides detailed analysis of Brann's season so far, including player performance metrics, form analysis, home and away performance, disciplinary records, and competitive insights. The data reflects the team's performance through 6 matches, showcasing their strengths, areas for development, and overall contribution to the competition.
Home Advantage
Strong home advantage
Points per Game
Home vs Away Points
Performance Summary
Brann's home advantage is 1.33 points per game, indicating that the team significantly benefits from playing in front of their home supporters. The team averages 2.00 points at home compared to 0.67 points away.
Brann has accumulated 6 points at home from 3 matches (2W 0D 1L) and 2 points away from 3 matches (0W 2D 1L). This demonstrates a significant home advantage, highlighting their reliance on home support and familiar surroundings. The team's ability to consistently perform at home suggests they thrive in their own stadium environment.
The team's strong home form, with 2.00 points per game at home, indicates that Brann leverages their home advantage effectively. This consistent performance in front of their supporters is a key strength that contributes significantly to their overall season performance.
Average Goals per Match
Across 6 matches
Team Goals per Game
Goals scored per match
Goals per Match Distribution
Distribution by Percentage
Summary
Across 6 completed matches for Brann, the team's matches average 2.17 goals per match. The most frequent outcome is 2-3 goals, representing 3 matches (50.0% of all fixtures), indicating a balanced approach where both attacking play and defensive organization are rewarded.
Low-scoring encounters (0-1 goals) make up 33.3% of matches (2 matches), highlighting the importance of defensive discipline and tactical awareness. Meanwhile, high-scoring thrillers (4+ goals) have occurred 1 times (16.7% of all matches), demonstrating the attacking quality and entertainment value present throughout the season.
The team's tactical sophistication is evident in its 1.00 goals per game average, reflecting a focus on defensive organization and strategic play. This distribution indicates that the team prioritizes defensive stability, making every goal valuable and matches often decided by fine margins and tactical execution.
Yellow Cards
Red Cards
Total Cards
Total Fouls
Cards per Foul
Cards Distribution
Penalty Conversion
No penalty data available
Penalty statistics will appear here once data is collected
Disciplinary Events Overview
Disciplinary Analysis
Brann has demonstrated a relatively disciplined style of play throughout the season. The team has seen 8 total cards issued across 6 matches, with 8 yellow cards and 0 red cards. This translates to an average of 1.33 cards per match, demonstrating relatively disciplined conduct throughout the season.
Yellow card distribution shows that 100.0% of all disciplinary actions were cautions, averaging 1.33 yellow cards per match. The team recorded 61 total fouls, averaging 10.17 fouls per match, which provides context for the disciplinary patterns observed.
Overall, the disciplinary record of Brann reflects a disciplined approach to match conduct. The balance between competitive intensity and disciplinary control shapes the tactical landscape, influencing how the team approaches matches and manages player behavior throughout the season.
Attack Efficiency
Goals per game
Defense Efficiency
Goals conceded per game
Points Efficiency
Points per game
Efficiency Analysis
Team efficiency metrics reveal how effectively Brann converts opportunities into results. The team leads in attack efficiency with 1.00 goals per game, while demonstrating defensive efficiency, conceding just 1.17 goals per game.
The most efficient teams combine strong attacking output with defensive discipline.Brann leads in points efficiency with 1.33 points per game, demonstrating the optimal balance between scoring goals and preventing them. Teams that maintain high efficiency rates throughout the season consistently challenge for top positions and maximize their potential.
Efficiency metrics provide deeper insights than simple win-loss records, revealing which teams are getting the most out of their opportunities. Brann's goal difference of -1 reflects that the team concedes more goals than they score on average, suggesting defensive improvements are needed.
Brann shows a Net buyer posture this window: spent €2,550,000 and recouped €420,000, for a net of -€2,130,000. Incoming moves: 8, outgoing moves: 3.
| Player | Fee | From | To | Date |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| — | Dec 31, 2025 | |||
| €1,300,000 | Sep 02, 2025 | |||
| €1,000,000 | Aug 28, 2025 | |||
| — | Aug 26, 2025 | |||
| — | Aug 19, 2025 | |||
| €250,000 | Aug 19, 2025 | |||
| — | Jul 14, 2025 | |||
| — | Jul 11, 2025 |
Stabæk
Brann
Rosenborg
Brann
Sheriff
Brann
Vitesse
Brann
Brann II
Brann
Sporting Charleroi
Brann
Norwich City
Brann
Lyngby Boldklub
Brann| Team | Inbound | Outbound | Spent | Recouped | Net |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
![]() | 8 | 3 | €2,550,000 | €420,000 | -€2,130,000 |
![]() | 11 | 15 | €36,280,000 | €57,792,000 | +€21,512,000 |
![]() | 3 | 4 | €10,000,000 | €13,000,000 | +€3,000,000 |
![]() | 5 | 11 | €30,000,000 | €51,150,000 | +€21,150,000 |
![]() | 7 | 9 | €40,500,000 | €29,000,000 | -€11,500,000 |
![]() | 0 | 6 | €0 | €30,300,000 | +€30,300,000 |
![]() | 3 | 15 | €2,500,000 | €1,450,000 | -€1,050,000 |
![]() | 3 | 9 | €12,000,000 | €42,150,000 | +€30,150,000 |
![]() | 13 | 14 | €61,750,000 | €74,065,000 | +€12,315,000 |
![]() | 5 | 5 | €34,000,000 | €109,000,000 | +€75,000,000 |
![]() | 9 | 11 | €63,600,000 | €1,500,000 | -€62,100,000 |
![]() | 12 | 15 | €217,900,000 | €100,400,000 | -€117,500,000 |
![]() | 9 | 16 | €61,000,000 | €27,300,000 | -€33,700,000 |
![]() | 6 | 23 | €33,500,000 | €79,200,000 | +€45,700,000 |
![]() | 1 | 3 | €0 | €7,500,000 | +€7,500,000 |
![]() | 8 | 13 | €10,430,000 | €39,500,000 | +€29,070,000 |
![]() | 3 | 4 | €9,000,000 | €28,200,000 | +€19,200,000 |
![]() | 7 | 15 | €13,800,000 | €39,300,000 | +€25,500,000 |
![]() | 5 | 10 | €10,500,000 | €0 | -€10,500,000 |
![]() | 4 | 3 | €3,000,000 | €0 | -€3,000,000 |
![]() | 8 | 7 | €33,500,000 | €90,500,000 | +€57,000,000 |
![]() | 7 | 14 | €10,450,000 | €19,500,000 | +€9,050,000 |
![]() | 4 | 5 | €2,100,000 | €5,150,000 | +€3,050,000 |
![]() | 7 | 8 | €13,330,000 | €27,650,000 | +€14,320,000 |
![]() | 6 | 15 | €1,000,000 | €1,750,000 | +€750,000 |
![]() | 6 | 6 | €6,600,000 | €8,250,000 | +€1,650,000 |
![]() | 3 | 12 | €50,000 | €300,000 | +€250,000 |
![]() | 4 | 2 | €400,000 | €6,000,000 | +€5,600,000 |
![]() | 5 | 8 | €2,000,000 | €6,000,000 | +€4,000,000 |
![]() | 9 | 14 | €29,000,000 | €60,000,000 | +€31,000,000 |
![]() | 2 | 13 | €4,000,000 | €60,750,000 | +€56,750,000 |
![]() | 1 | 1 | €0 | €0 | €0 |
![]() | 7 | 13 | €20,000,000 | €27,730,000 | +€7,730,000 |
![]() | 7 | 8 | €1,300,000 | €3,300,000 | +€2,000,000 |
![]() | 5 | 15 | €4,650,000 | €13,200,000 | +€8,550,000 |
![]() | 5 | 11 | €17,000,000 | €53,000,000 | +€36,000,000 |




































Biggest Fees (League Teams)

VfB Stuttgart →
Newcastle United
Nottingham Forest →
Newcastle United
Aston Villa →
Newcastle United
Ipswich Town →
Nottingham Forest
Bologna →
Nottingham Forest
LOSC Lille →
Paris Saint GermainSummary
The most aggressive spender is Nottingham Forest (€217,900,000 outlay), while VfB Stuttgart leads receipts at €109,000,000. Net leaders are topped by VfB Stuttgart (+€75,000,000), with the largest deficit at Nottingham Forest (-€117,500,000). Activity bars flag recruitment volume; money-flow bars reveal gross spend plus recouped fees, surfacing the most liquid clubs. Biggest-fee deals spotlight premium valuations (Nick Woltemade for €75,000,000), guiding scouts to headline movers and hinting where quieter value may remain.
Top Scorer

Top Assists

Top Rated

Goals per 90
Shots per 90
Tackles per 90
Clean Sheets
Saves per 90
Summary
Sævar Atli Magnusson leads Brann's scoring charts with 4 goals, demonstrating exceptional finishing ability and consistency throughout the season. Joachim Soltvedt has provided the most assists with 3, highlighting the creative talent in the team. The squad features a diverse range of attacking players, with the top 10 scorers contributing significantly to the team's success.
These players represent the elite talent in Brann, showcasing world-class skills across scoring, creativity, defensive work, and goalkeeping. The per-90 statistics provide fair comparisons across players with varying playing time, highlighting those who make the most impact when on the pitch.
Top Goal Scorers in Competition











Top Assists in Competition











Top Rated Players in Competition











Summary
This ranking compares Brann's top performers with the best players across the entire competition, showing how the team's elite talent stacks up against other teams' top players. The rankings are sorted by total goals, assists, and average rating, providing a clear view of where Brann's players rank within the competition.
In the goal-scoring category, Brann's top scorer Sævar Atli Magnusson ranks 11th out of the top 11 players with 4 goals, contributing valuable goals to Brann's attack.
For assists, Brann's top playmaker Joachim Soltvedt ranks 11th out of the top 11 players with 3 assists, providing valuable creativity to Brann's attack.
In player ratings, Brann's highest-rated player Jonas Tviberg Torsvik ranks 11th out of the top 11 players with a 7.2 rating, contributing consistently to Brann's performances.
No upcoming fixtures with compelling storylines at this time.
What is Brann's current position?
Brann is currently in position #22 with 8 points from 6 matches.
Who is Brann's top scorer?
Sævar Atli Magnusson leads Brann with 4 goals this season.
How has Brann performed at home vs away?
Brann has earned 6 points at home and 2 points away. The team performs better at home.
What is Brann's goal difference?
Brann has a goal difference of -1, having scored 6 goals and conceded 7 goals.
How many clean sheets has Brann kept?
Brann has kept 3 clean sheets this season, averaging 0.50 clean sheets per game.
What is Brann's win rate?
Brann has a win rate of 33.3%, with 2 wins, 2 draws, and 2 losses.
Brann is currently competing in the 2025/2026 season, sitting in position #22 with 8 points from 6 matches, achieving a record of 2 wins, 2 draws, and 2 losses. The team averages 1.00 goals per game with a 33.3% win rate.
Brann has a goal difference of -1, having scored 6 goals and conceded 7 goals.Sævar Atli Magnusson tops the scoring charts with 4 goals. Joachim Soltvedt leads in assists with 3, highlighting the creative talent throughout the team.
Home and away performance analysis shows that Brann has earned 6 home pointscompared to 2 away points. The team demonstrates a slight home advantage with a 1.3% difference.
Goal distribution analysis shows that matches with 2-3 goals represent the most common outcome, accounting for 50% of all matches. The highest-scoring match was Brann vs Fenerbahçe, ending 0-4 with 4 total goals. The biggest victory margin came when Brann defeated Rangers 3-0 with a 3-goal margin. These statistics highlight the competitive nature and entertainment value of Brann's season.
This comprehensive analysis covers Brann's performance in the 2025/2026 season in Norway, providing detailed statistics and insights into the team's performance, player contributions, and competitive standing.











