Footbodds Logofootbodds
Pisa crest

Pisa

ItalyItalyFounded 1909
Alberto Gilardino
Alberto GilardinoManager
Arena Garibaldi - Stadio Romeo Anconetani
Home Venue
Arena Garibaldi - Stadio Romeo Anconetani
10,442 capacity

Season Report & Analysis

Pisa - League 2025/2026

Comprehensive statistical analysis of Pisa's season performance, including team metrics, player statistics, form analysis, home/away performance, and detailed insights.

Pisa is currently competing in the League 2025/2026 season, sitting in 19th position with 13 points from 20 matches. The team represents Italy in this competition.

The team's record of 1 wins from 20 matches represents a 5.0% win rate, indicating a challenging season. With 15 goals scored and 30 goals conceded, the team achieved a -15 goal difference, indicating areas for improvement in both attack and defense. The team averaged 0.75 goals per game, demonstrating modest attacking output.

This comprehensive report provides detailed analysis of Pisa's season so far, including player performance metrics, form analysis, home and away performance, disciplinary records, and competitive insights. The data reflects the team's performance through 20 matches, showcasing their strengths, areas for development, and overall contribution to the competition.

Home Advantage

-14.3%

Minimal home advantage

Points per Game

0.60Home
0.70Away

Home vs Away Points

Performance Summary

Pisa's home advantage is 0.10 points per game, suggesting balanced performance regardless of venue. The team averages 0.60 points at home compared to 0.70 points away.

Pisa has accumulated 6 points at home from 10 matches (1W 3D 6L) and 7 points away from 10 matches (0W 7D 3L). This balanced record demonstrates their ability to perform consistently regardless of venue, showing adaptability and mental strength in different environments.

Pisa shows remarkable consistency across venues, with the most balanced home-away record - 6 home points and 7 away points - demonstrating their ability to perform consistently regardless of venue. This balanced approach indicates strong mental resilience and tactical adaptability.

Average Goals per Match

2.40

Across 20 matches

Team Goals per Game

0.75

Goals scored per match

Goals per Match Distribution

Distribution by Percentage

0-1 goals
8 matches (40.0%)
2-3 goals
5 matches (25.0%)
4-5 goals
7 matches (35.0%)
6+ goals
0 matches (0.0%)

Summary

Across 20 completed matches for Pisa, the team's matches average 2.40 goals per match. The most frequent outcome is 0-1 goals, representing 8 matches (40.0% of all fixtures), indicating a balanced approach where both attacking play and defensive organization are rewarded.

Low-scoring encounters (0-1 goals) make up 40.0% of matches (8 matches), highlighting the importance of defensive discipline and tactical awareness. Meanwhile, high-scoring thrillers (4+ goals) have occurred 7 times (35.0% of all matches), demonstrating the attacking quality and entertainment value present throughout the season.

The team's tactical sophistication is evident in its 0.75 goals per game average, reflecting a focus on defensive organization and strategic play. This distribution indicates that the team prioritizes defensive stability, making every goal valuable and matches often decided by fine margins and tactical execution.

Yellow Cards

231.15 per match

Red Cards

10.05 per match

Total Cards

241.20 per match

Total Fouls

1577.85 per match

Cards per Foul

0.153High frequency

Cards Distribution

Penalty Conversion

No penalty data available

Penalty statistics will appear here once data is collected

Disciplinary Events Overview

Disciplinary Analysis

Pisa has demonstrated a relatively disciplined style of play throughout the season. The team has seen 24 total cards issued across 20 matches, with 23 yellow cards and 1 red cards. This translates to an average of 1.20 cards per match, demonstrating relatively disciplined conduct throughout the season.

Yellow card distribution shows that 95.8% of all disciplinary actions were cautions, averaging 1.15 yellow cards per match. Red cards accounted for 4.2% of total disciplinary actions, with an average of 0.05 red cards per match. The team recorded 157 total fouls, averaging 7.85 fouls per match, which provides context for the disciplinary patterns observed.

Overall, the disciplinary record of Pisa reflects a disciplined approach to match conduct. The balance between competitive intensity and disciplinary control shapes the tactical landscape, influencing how the team approaches matches and manages player behavior throughout the season.

Attack Efficiency

0.75

Goals per game

Defense Efficiency

1.50

Goals conceded per game

Points Efficiency

0.65

Points per game

Efficiency Analysis

Team efficiency metrics reveal how effectively Pisa converts opportunities into results. The team leads in attack efficiency with 0.75 goals per game, while demonstrating defensive efficiency, conceding just 1.50 goals per game.

The most efficient teams combine strong attacking output with defensive discipline.Pisa leads in points efficiency with 0.65 points per game, demonstrating the optimal balance between scoring goals and preventing them. Teams that maintain high efficiency rates throughout the season consistently challenge for top positions and maximize their potential.

Efficiency metrics provide deeper insights than simple win-loss records, revealing which teams are getting the most out of their opportunities. Pisa's goal difference of -15 reflects that the team concedes more goals than they score on average, suggesting defensive improvements are needed.

Incoming
4
Outgoing
14
Spent
€500,000
Recouped
€300,000

Pisa shows a Net buyer posture this window: spent €500,000 and recouped €300,000, for a net of -€200,000. Incoming moves: 4, outgoing moves: 14.

Raúl Albiol
Raúl Albiol
Sep 02, 2025
Free
TBCTBC
PisaPisa
Giovanni Bonfanti
Giovanni Bonfanti
Sep 01, 2025
Free
AtalantaAtalanta
PisaPisa
Lorran
Lorran
Sep 01, 2025
€500,000
FlamengoFlamengo
PisaPisa
C. Stengs
C. Stengs
Aug 28, 2025
Free
FeyenoordFeyenoord
PisaPisa
TeamInboundOutboundSpentRecoupedNet
Pisa
414€500,000€300,000-€200,000
Inter
13€1,000,000€6,000,000+€5,000,000
AC Milan
35€51,000,000€12,500,000-€38,500,000
Napoli
24€8,000,000€200,000-€7,800,000
Juventus
25€18,800,000€17,500,000-€1,300,000
Roma
22€6,600,000€0-€6,600,000
Como
413€3,450,000€0-€3,450,000
Atalanta
14€4,000,000€3,500,000-€500,000
Lazio
10€0€0€0
Bologna
27€17,500,000€1,200,000-€16,300,000
Udinese
43€7,500,000€0-€7,500,000
Torino
23€2,000,000€1,000,000-€1,000,000
Sassuolo
37€200,000€0-€200,000
Cremonese
47€300,000€1,000,000+€700,000
Parma
57€0€2,000,000+€2,000,000
Genoa
25€500,000€0-€500,000
Cagliari
42€6,000,000€25,000,000+€19,000,000
Lecce
43€7,500,000€0-€7,500,000
Fiorentina
45€32,000,000€3,000,000-€29,000,000
Hellas Verona
56€3,000,000€0-€3,000,000
Pisa
Activity (in/out)18
Money Flow (spent+recouped)€800,000
Net-€200,000
Inter
Activity (in/out)4
Money Flow (spent+recouped)€7,000,000
Net+€5,000,000
AC Milan
Activity (in/out)8
Money Flow (spent+recouped)€63,500,000
Net-€38,500,000
Napoli
Activity (in/out)6
Money Flow (spent+recouped)€8,200,000
Net-€7,800,000
Juventus
Activity (in/out)7
Money Flow (spent+recouped)€36,300,000
Net-€1,300,000
Roma
Activity (in/out)4
Money Flow (spent+recouped)€6,600,000
Net-€6,600,000
Como
Activity (in/out)17
Money Flow (spent+recouped)€3,450,000
Net-€3,450,000
Atalanta
Activity (in/out)5
Money Flow (spent+recouped)€7,500,000
Net-€500,000
Lazio
Activity (in/out)1
Money Flow (spent+recouped)€0
Net€0
Bologna
Activity (in/out)9
Money Flow (spent+recouped)€18,700,000
Net-€16,300,000
Udinese
Activity (in/out)7
Money Flow (spent+recouped)€7,500,000
Net-€7,500,000
Torino
Activity (in/out)5
Money Flow (spent+recouped)€3,000,000
Net-€1,000,000
Sassuolo
Activity (in/out)10
Money Flow (spent+recouped)€200,000
Net-€200,000
Cremonese
Activity (in/out)11
Money Flow (spent+recouped)€1,300,000
Net+€700,000
Parma
Activity (in/out)12
Money Flow (spent+recouped)€2,000,000
Net+€2,000,000
Genoa
Activity (in/out)7
Money Flow (spent+recouped)€500,000
Net-€500,000
Cagliari
Activity (in/out)6
Money Flow (spent+recouped)€31,000,000
Net+€19,000,000
Lecce
Activity (in/out)7
Money Flow (spent+recouped)€7,500,000
Net-€7,500,000
Fiorentina
Activity (in/out)9
Money Flow (spent+recouped)€35,000,000
Net-€29,000,000
Hellas Verona
Activity (in/out)11
Money Flow (spent+recouped)€3,000,000
Net-€3,000,000
Biggest Fees (League Teams)
Christopher Nkunku
Christopher NkunkuChelseaAC Milan
€37,000,000
Roberto Piccoli
Roberto PiccoliCagliariFiorentina
€25,000,000
Jonathan Rowe
Jonathan RoweOlympique MarseilleBologna
€17,000,000
Edon Zhegrova
Edon ZhegrovaLOSC LilleJuventus
€15,500,000
Nicolò Savona
Nicolò SavonaJuventusNottingham Forest
€13,000,000
David Odogu
David OdoguVfL WolfsburgAC Milan
€7,000,000
Summary

The most aggressive spender is AC Milan (€51,000,000 outlay), while Cagliari leads receipts at €25,000,000. Net leaders are topped by Cagliari (+€19,000,000), with the largest deficit at AC Milan (-€38,500,000). Activity bars flag recruitment volume; money-flow bars reveal gross spend plus recouped fees, surfacing the most liquid clubs. Biggest-fee deals spotlight premium valuations (Christopher Nkunku for €37,000,000), guiding scouts to headline movers and hinting where quieter value may remain.

Summary

Stefano Moreo leads Pisa's scoring charts with 3 goals, demonstrating exceptional finishing ability and consistency throughout the season. Mehdi Pascal Marcel Léris has provided the most assists with 2, highlighting the creative talent in the team. The squad features a diverse range of attacking players, with the top 8 scorers contributing significantly to the team's success.

These players represent the elite talent in Pisa, showcasing world-class skills across scoring, creativity, defensive work, and goalkeeping. The per-90 statistics provide fair comparisons across players with varying playing time, highlighting those who make the most impact when on the pitch.

Summary

This ranking compares Pisa's top performers with the best players across the entire competition, showing how the team's elite talent stacks up against other teams' top players. The rankings are sorted by total goals, assists, and average rating, providing a clear view of where Pisa's players rank within the competition.

In the goal-scoring category, Pisa's top scorer Stefano Moreo ranks 11th out of the top 11 players with 3 goals, contributing valuable goals to Pisa's attack.

For assists, Pisa's top playmaker Mehdi Pascal Marcel Léris ranks 11th out of the top 11 players with 2 assists, providing valuable creativity to Pisa's attack.

In player ratings, Pisa's highest-rated player Adrian Šemper ranks 11th out of the top 11 players with a 7.0 rating, contributing consistently to Pisa's performances.

Upcoming fixtures with compelling storylines based on Pisa's position, form, and what's at stake.

Summary

A must-win fixture for Pisa (19th, 13 pts) as they visit Inter (1th, 43 pts).

In a relegation six-pointer, Pisa (19th, 13 pts) visits Hellas Verona (20th, 13 pts) with survival at stake. Both teams are desperate for points, with only 0 points between them in the fight to avoid the drop. Pisa has struggled recently, managing just 0 points from their last 3 matches. Hellas Verona has also found points hard to come by, with only 0 points in their recent games.

A must-win fixture for Pisa (19th, 13 pts) as they host AC Milan (2th, 40 pts).

In a relegation six-pointer, Pisa (19th, 13 pts) visits Fiorentina (18th, 14 pts) with survival at stake. Both teams are desperate for points, with only 1 point between them in the fight to avoid the drop. Pisa has struggled recently, managing just 0 points from their last 3 matches. Fiorentina has also found points hard to come by, with only 0 points in their recent games.

In a relegation six-pointer, Pisa (19th, 13 pts) hosts Cagliari (16th, 19 pts) with survival at stake. Pisa has struggled recently, managing just 0 points from their last 3 matches. Cagliari has also found points hard to come by, with only 0 points in their recent games.

What is Pisa's current position?

Pisa is currently in position #19 with 13 points from 20 matches.

Who is Pisa's top scorer?

Stefano Moreo leads Pisa with 3 goals this season.

How has Pisa performed at home vs away?

Pisa has earned 6 points at home and 7 points away. The team performs better away from home.

What is Pisa's goal difference?

Pisa has a goal difference of -15, having scored 15 goals and conceded 30 goals.

How many clean sheets has Pisa kept?

Pisa has kept 4 clean sheets this season, averaging 0.20 clean sheets per game.

What is Pisa's win rate?

Pisa has a win rate of 5%, with 1 wins, 10 draws, and 9 losses.

Pisa is currently competing in the 2025/2026 season, sitting in position #19 with 13 points from 20 matches, achieving a record of 1 wins, 10 draws, and 9 losses. The team averages 0.75 goals per game with a 5.0% win rate.

Pisa has a goal difference of -15, having scored 15 goals and conceded 30 goals.Stefano Moreo tops the scoring charts with 3 goals. Mehdi Pascal Marcel Léris leads in assists with 2, highlighting the creative talent throughout the team.

Home and away performance analysis shows that Pisa has earned 6 home pointscompared to 7 away points.

Goal distribution analysis shows that matches with 0-1 goals represent the most common outcome, accounting for 40% of all matches. The highest-scoring match was Napoli vs Pisa, ending 3-2 with 5 total goals. The biggest victory margin came when Pisa defeated Cremonese 1-0 with a 1-goal margin. These statistics highlight the competitive nature and entertainment value of Pisa's season.

This comprehensive analysis covers Pisa's performance in the 2025/2026 season in Italy, providing detailed statistics and insights into the team's performance, player contributions, and competitive standing.