Footbodds Logo
Como crest

Como odds

ItalyItalyFounded 1907
Cesc Fàbregas
Cesc FàbregasManager
Stadio Giuseppe Sinigaglia
Home Venue
Stadio Giuseppe Sinigaglia
13,602 capacity

Season Report & Analysis

Como - League 2025/2026

Comprehensive statistical analysis of Como's season performance, including team metrics, player statistics, form analysis, home/away performance, and detailed insights.

Como is currently competing in the League 2025/2026 season, sitting in 6th position with 42 points from 25 matches. The team represents Italy in this competition.

The team's record of 11 wins from 25 matches represents a 44.0% win rate, showing mixed results throughout the campaign. With 39 goals scored and 19 goals conceded, the team achieved a +20 goal difference, highlighting their attacking prowess and defensive solidity. The team averaged 1.56 goals per game, demonstrating decent attacking output.

This comprehensive report provides detailed analysis of Como's season so far, including player performance metrics, form analysis, home and away performance, disciplinary records, and competitive insights. The data reflects the team's performance through 25 matches, showcasing their strengths, areas for development, and overall contribution to the competition.

Como sits in position #6 with 42 points from 25 matches played this season.

Como is currently competing in the 2025/2026 season, sitting in position #6 with 42 points from 25 matches, achieving a record of 11 wins, 9 draws, and 5 losses. The team averages 1.56 goals per game with a 44.0% win rate.

Como has a goal difference of +20, having scored 39 goals and conceded 19 goals.Anastasios Douvikas tops the scoring charts with 8 goals. Jesús Rodríguez Caraballo leads in assists with 6, highlighting the creative talent throughout the team.

Home and away performance analysis shows that Como has earned 23 home pointscompared to 19 away points. The team demonstrates a slight home advantage with a 0.2% difference.

Goal distribution analysis shows that matches with 2-3 goals represent the most common outcome, accounting for 52% of all matches. The highest-scoring match was Torino vs Como, ending 1-5 with 6 total goals. The biggest victory margin came when Como defeated Torino 6-0 with a 6-goal margin. These statistics highlight the competitive nature and entertainment value of Como's season.

This comprehensive analysis covers Como's performance in the 2025/2026 season in Italy, providing detailed statistics and insights into the team's performance, player contributions, and competitive standing.

The top scorer leads the scoring charts with 8 goals. View goals, assists, and ratings for Como's squad.

Summary

Anastasios Douvikas leads Como's scoring charts with 8 goals, demonstrating exceptional finishing ability and consistency throughout the season. Jesús Rodríguez Caraballo has provided the most assists with 6, highlighting the creative talent in the team. The squad features a diverse range of attacking players, with the top 10 scorers contributing significantly to the team's success.

These players represent the elite talent in Como, showcasing world-class skills across scoring, creativity, defensive work, and goalkeeping. The per-90 statistics provide fair comparisons across players with varying playing time, highlighting those who make the most impact when on the pitch.

Como has earned 23 points at home and 19 points away. Performance is balanced across venues.

Home Advantage

+11.7%

Moderate home advantage

Points per Game

1.77Home
1.58Away

Home vs Away Points

Performance Summary

Como's home advantage is 0.19 points per game, suggesting balanced performance regardless of venue. The team averages 1.77 points at home compared to 1.58 points away.

Como has accumulated 23 points at home from 13 matches (6W 5D 2L) and 19 points away from 12 matches (5W 4D 3L). This balanced record demonstrates their ability to perform consistently regardless of venue, showing adaptability and mental strength in different environments.

Como shows remarkable consistency across venues, with the most balanced home-away record - 23 home points and 19 away points - demonstrating their ability to perform consistently regardless of venue. This balanced approach indicates strong mental resilience and tactical adaptability.

Matches average 1.6 goals per game. The most common outcome is 2-3 total goals.

Average Goals per Match

2.50

Across 25 matches

Team Goals per Game

1.56

Goals scored per match

Goals per Match Distribution

Distribution by Percentage

0-1 goals
7 matches (28.0%)
2-3 goals
13 matches (52.0%)
4-5 goals
3 matches (12.0%)
6+ goals
2 matches (8.0%)

Summary

Across 25 completed matches for Como, the team's matches average 2.50 goals per match. The most frequent outcome is 2-3 goals, representing 13 matches (52.0% of all fixtures), indicating a balanced approach where both attacking play and defensive organization are rewarded.

Low-scoring encounters (0-1 goals) make up 28.0% of matches (7 matches), highlighting the importance of defensive discipline and tactical awareness. Meanwhile, high-scoring thrillers (4+ goals) have occurred 5 times (20.0% of all matches), demonstrating the attacking quality and entertainment value present throughout the season.

The team's tactical sophistication is evident in its 1.56 goals per game average, reflecting a focus on defensive organization and strategic play. This distribution indicates that the team prioritizes defensive stability, making every goal valuable and matches often decided by fine margins and tactical execution.

Como scores 1.56 goals per game while conceding 0.76. Overall points efficiency: 1.68 points per match.

Attack Efficiency

1.56

Goals per game

Defense Efficiency

0.76

Goals conceded per game

Points Efficiency

1.68

Points per game

Efficiency Analysis

Team efficiency metrics reveal how effectively Como converts opportunities into results. The team leads in attack efficiency with 1.56 goals per game, while demonstrating defensive efficiency, conceding just 0.76 goals per game.

The most efficient teams combine strong attacking output with defensive discipline.Como leads in points efficiency with 1.68 points per game, demonstrating the optimal balance between scoring goals and preventing them. Teams that maintain high efficiency rates throughout the season consistently challenge for top positions and maximize their potential.

Efficiency metrics provide deeper insights than simple win-loss records, revealing which teams are getting the most out of their opportunities. Como's goal difference of +20 reflects a positive attacking efficiency compared to defensive efficiency, indicating strong offensive capabilities.

Como has received 28 cards this season (26 yellow, 2 red) from 200 fouls.

Yellow Cards

261.04 per match

Red Cards

20.08 per match

Total Cards

281.12 per match

Total Fouls

2008.00 per match

Cards per Foul

0.140Moderate frequency

Cards Distribution

Penalty Conversion

No penalty data available

Penalty statistics will appear here once data is collected

Disciplinary Events Overview

Disciplinary Analysis

Como has demonstrated a relatively disciplined style of play throughout the season. The team has seen 28 total cards issued across 25 matches, with 26 yellow cards and 2 red cards. This translates to an average of 1.12 cards per match, demonstrating relatively disciplined conduct throughout the season.

Yellow card distribution shows that 92.9% of all disciplinary actions were cautions, averaging 1.04 yellow cards per match. Red cards accounted for 7.1% of total disciplinary actions, with an average of 0.08 red cards per match. The team recorded 200 total fouls, averaging 8.00 fouls per match, which provides context for the disciplinary patterns observed.

Overall, the disciplinary record of Como reflects a disciplined approach to match conduct. The balance between competitive intensity and disciplinary control shapes the tactical landscape, influencing how the team approaches matches and manages player behavior throughout the season.

Upcoming fixtures with compelling storylines based on Como's current position (#6), recent form, and what's at stake.

Upcoming fixtures with compelling storylines based on Como's position, form, and what's at stake.

Summary

A European qualification battle sees Como (6th, 42 pts) host Roma (4th, 47 pts) with European spots on the line. These teams are separated by just 2 positions and 5 points, making this a must-win for Como.

A position battle sees Como (6th, 42 pts) host Napoli (3th, 50 pts) in a competitive fixture. With just 3 positions and 8 points separating them, this match could prove pivotal for Como's season objectives.

Winter 2026 window: 4 incoming, 13 outgoing. Net buyer this window.

Incoming
4
Outgoing
13
Spent
€3,450,000
Recouped
€0

Como is a [Net buyer] in the [Winter 2026 window]. Spent €3,450,000 and recouped €0, for a net of -€3,450,000. Incoming moves: 4, outgoing moves: 13.

Stefan Posch
Stefan Posch
Sep 01, 2025
€500,000
BolognaBologna
ComoComo
Diego Carlos
Diego Carlos
Sep 01, 2025
€2,800,000
FenerbahçeFenerbahçe
ComoComo
Noel Törnqvist
Noel Törnqvist
Aug 30, 2025
Free
MjällbyMjällby
ComoComo
Nikola Cavlina 
Nikola Cavlina 
Aug 29, 2025
€150,000
Dinamo ZagrebDinamo Zagreb
ComoComo

Compare Como's transfer activity against other teams in the league during the Winter 2026 window.

TeamInboundOutboundSpentRecoupedNet
Como
413€3,450,000€0-€3,450,000
Inter
13€1,000,000€6,000,000+€5,000,000
AC Milan
35€51,000,000€12,500,000-€38,500,000
Napoli
24€8,000,000€200,000-€7,800,000
Roma
22€6,600,000€0-€6,600,000
Juventus
25€18,800,000€17,500,000-€1,300,000
Atalanta
14€4,000,000€3,500,000-€500,000
Bologna
27€17,500,000€1,200,000-€16,300,000
Lazio
10€0€0€0
Sassuolo
37€200,000€0-€200,000
Udinese
43€7,500,000€0-€7,500,000
Parma
57€0€2,000,000+€2,000,000
Cagliari
42€6,000,000€25,000,000+€19,000,000
Torino
23€2,000,000€1,000,000-€1,000,000
Cremonese
47€300,000€1,000,000+€700,000
Genoa
25€500,000€0-€500,000
Lecce
43€7,500,000€0-€7,500,000
Fiorentina
45€32,000,000€3,000,000-€29,000,000
Pisa
414€500,000€300,000-€200,000
Hellas Verona
56€3,000,000€0-€3,000,000
Como
Activity (in/out)17
Money Flow (spent+recouped)€3,450,000
Net-€3,450,000
Inter
Activity (in/out)4
Money Flow (spent+recouped)€7,000,000
Net+€5,000,000
AC Milan
Activity (in/out)8
Money Flow (spent+recouped)€63,500,000
Net-€38,500,000
Napoli
Activity (in/out)6
Money Flow (spent+recouped)€8,200,000
Net-€7,800,000
Roma
Activity (in/out)4
Money Flow (spent+recouped)€6,600,000
Net-€6,600,000
Juventus
Activity (in/out)7
Money Flow (spent+recouped)€36,300,000
Net-€1,300,000
Atalanta
Activity (in/out)5
Money Flow (spent+recouped)€7,500,000
Net-€500,000
Bologna
Activity (in/out)9
Money Flow (spent+recouped)€18,700,000
Net-€16,300,000
Lazio
Activity (in/out)1
Money Flow (spent+recouped)€0
Net€0
Sassuolo
Activity (in/out)10
Money Flow (spent+recouped)€200,000
Net-€200,000
Udinese
Activity (in/out)7
Money Flow (spent+recouped)€7,500,000
Net-€7,500,000
Parma
Activity (in/out)12
Money Flow (spent+recouped)€2,000,000
Net+€2,000,000
Cagliari
Activity (in/out)6
Money Flow (spent+recouped)€31,000,000
Net+€19,000,000
Torino
Activity (in/out)5
Money Flow (spent+recouped)€3,000,000
Net-€1,000,000
Cremonese
Activity (in/out)11
Money Flow (spent+recouped)€1,300,000
Net+€700,000
Genoa
Activity (in/out)7
Money Flow (spent+recouped)€500,000
Net-€500,000
Lecce
Activity (in/out)7
Money Flow (spent+recouped)€7,500,000
Net-€7,500,000
Fiorentina
Activity (in/out)9
Money Flow (spent+recouped)€35,000,000
Net-€29,000,000
Pisa
Activity (in/out)18
Money Flow (spent+recouped)€800,000
Net-€200,000
Hellas Verona
Activity (in/out)11
Money Flow (spent+recouped)€3,000,000
Net-€3,000,000
Biggest Fees (League Teams)
Christopher Nkunku
Christopher NkunkuChelseaAC Milan
€37,000,000
Roberto Piccoli
Roberto PiccoliCagliariFiorentina
€25,000,000
Jonathan Rowe
Jonathan RoweOlympique MarseilleBologna
€17,000,000
Edon Zhegrova
Edon ZhegrovaLOSC LilleJuventus
€15,500,000
Nicolò Savona
Nicolò SavonaJuventusNottingham Forest
€13,000,000
Adrien Rabiot
Adrien RabiotOlympique MarseilleAC Milan
€7,000,000
Summary

The most aggressive spender is AC Milan (€51,000,000 outlay), while Cagliari leads receipts at €25,000,000. Net leaders are topped by Cagliari (+€19,000,000), with the largest deficit at AC Milan (-€38,500,000). Activity bars flag recruitment volume; money-flow bars reveal gross spend plus recouped fees, surfacing the most liquid clubs. Biggest-fee deals spotlight premium valuations (Christopher Nkunku for €37,000,000), guiding scouts to headline movers and hinting where quieter value may remain.

See how Como's top performers compare against the league's best in goals, assists, and overall ratings.

Summary

This ranking compares Como's top performers with the best players across the entire competition, showing how the team's elite talent stacks up against other teams' top players. The rankings are sorted by total goals, assists, and average rating, providing a clear view of where Como's players rank within the competition.

In the goal-scoring category, Como's top scorer Anastasios Douvikas ranks second in the competition with 8 goals, placing among the elite attacking talent in the league.

For assists, Como's top playmaker Jesús Rodríguez Caraballo ranks second in the competition with 6 assists, showcasing strong creative talent.

In player ratings, Como's highest-rated player Nicolás Paz Martínez ranks third in the competition with a 7.6 rating, indicating world-class individual quality.

Common questions about Como's performance, statistics, and season outlook answered.

What is Como's current position?

Como is currently in position #6 with 42 points from 25 matches.

Who is Como's top scorer?

Anastasios Douvikas leads Como with 8 goals this season.

How has Como performed at home vs away?

Como has earned 23 points at home and 19 points away. The team performs better at home.

What is Como's goal difference?

Como has a goal difference of +20, having scored 39 goals and conceded 19 goals.

How many clean sheets has Como kept?

Como has kept 12 clean sheets this season, averaging 0.48 clean sheets per game.

What is Como's win rate?

Como has a win rate of 44%, with 11 wins, 9 draws, and 5 losses.